← All archive fragments

Fragment 71 of 72 · drawer 06

Progress bar with no sound

An intentionally quiet score showing that the absence of acoustic feedback can itself structure waiting behaviour.

Accession
MW-F-071
Representative period
Negative acoustic specimen
Drawer
Acoustic notation
Certainty
interpretive
MUSEUM OF WAITING / RECONSTRUCTED RECORD MW-F-071

Progress bar with no sound

Negative acoustic specimen

Observed surface

00–70% no audible distinction

70–99% no audible distinction

99% hold room tone unchanged

Implied procedure

The visual estimate performs all communication while the machine may sound exactly as it did before the task.

A listener in another room cannot distinguish progress, pause, or failure.

Interpretive residue

Silence transfers vigilance to the screen.

Where older mechanisms leaked activity, a quiet interface asks the person to return, look, and interpret.

INTERPRETIVE COPY DO NOT CITE AS A HISTORICAL ARTEFACT

Accountability record

Evidence beneath the reconstruction.

These institutional sources support the mechanism or historical practice interpreted above. They do not contain this reconstructed record, its wording, or its invented values.

  1. ACM · 1985 The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces Brad A. Myers' 48-participant experiment: 86.1% preferred the percent-done condition, a result reported with p = .0006. The paper studied rather than invented the progress bar. Open institutional record ↗
  2. Nielsen Norman Group · 1993–2024 Response Times: The Three Important Limits A durable summary of the rough thresholds at which interaction feels immediate, continuous or attention-breaking. Open institutional record ↗